Monthly Archives: May 2012

┬áModifying Young’s Modulus or Tensile Strength of KNSB to Allow Casebonding

In this post I consider the possibility, by modifying the physical properties of the propellant, of reducing the odds of having a KNSB solid rocket engine crack its propellant grain during operation. Cracks in solid propellant result in an increase in burning area, which creates an increase in chamber pressure, which can (and recently did) result in the bursting of the rocket motor’s casing.

Here is the burst that was the impetus for these FEA experiments:

What is KNSB propellant? In short, it is a mix of potassium nitrate, which is an oxidizer, and sorbitol, a sugar-like fuel. Read more about it on Richard Nakka’s website.

What are the physical properties that I look at modifying? The first is Young’s modulus, which is a measure of the stiffness of a material. Materials with high Young’s modulus do not flex easily. Normal KNSB has a Young’s modulus higher than that of MDF, the fake wood used to make furniture: difficult to bend, like a desk top.

The other property I consider modifying is the tensile strength of the KNSB. As described on Richard Nakka’s website, KNSB appears to have a tensile strength of around 1050psi, roughly a quarter or half that of epoxy.

In the following plots the factor of safety, or FOS, is plotted on a star-core rocket grain inside an aluminum casing. 1000 psi of gas pressure has been applied to the inside of the star, to simulate the pressure of the motor starting to burn. The plot shown is a slice through the middle of the grain, where stresses are at their lowest; this is the best case in the entire grain. If the FOS here is below 1, the grain will crack. The FOS is plotted from 0 (red) to 3 (blue); 1.5 is a minimum value that we’d like to see, 3 is much better.

This first plot is basically the same situation in the earlier case cast post; it is a reference image at the given KNSB material properties of 850ksi Young’s and 1050psi tensile. Too much yellow, red, and orange, where it would (and probably did) crack.
Image
What happens if we drop the Young’s modulus to 70ksi, i.e. less than a tenth, making it as flexible as a plastic bottle? A significant improvement, but the outer points of the star are still weak.
Image

 

What if we had a KNSB that had that modulus of 70ksi and we managed to double the strength of the material to 2000psi? A dramatic improvement! No orange left in the plot, and almost the entire grain has a FOS of greater than 3.

Image

 

What’s it look like with just the increased tensile strength, and no modification to Young’s modulus? Here it is with 2000psi tensile KNSB. Not as good, but still a dramatic improvement over 1050psi KNSB.

 

Finally, how about that original 850ksi Young’s but a tripling of tensile strength to 3000psi? Improvement on roughly the same level as the previous best. Most of the grain has good margin.

 

 

Reducing the Young’s modulus to a tenth of its original value may require a lot of plasticizer. But tripling the tensile strength might be achievable by incorporating a relatively small proportion of fibers into the propellant.

Both plasticizers and reinforcing fibers are likely to be fuels, so the proportion of oxidizer would have to be adjusted to keep maximum performance. Depending on what was used as plasticizer, it could leave the propellant reasonably castable, whereas the fibers would likely make the molten propellant pastier and harder to cast.

On a more dogmatic level, one of the major objectives of Sugarshot to Space is to reach space with an inexpensive and low tech propellant, for which a two part plasticizer (as used in APCP motors) probably doesn’t qualify.

Either course would be an interesting science experiment, but to characterize the change well would require both physical material testing and instrumented test firing to see how the performance of the blend changes.

In the end, it may be more effective to first attempt changes to the grain geometry to reduce stresses on it during operation. Though such changes reduce the ultimate mass efficiency of the engine, they are more of an engineering problem than the “rocket science” of modifying the formulation.

Advertisements

Case bonded with silicone, lower Young’s Modulus

Another run of the star core KNSB grain bonded into an aluminum casing, but this time with a theoretical KNSB formulation that has a Young’s Modulus of 70ksi, rather than the prior example with unadulterated KNSB of 850ksi Young’s Modulus. The stresses are much less, and thus the factor of safety higher, because the grain can flex more with the casing.

Case bonded with silicone

Stresses in a case bonded KNSB rocket motor, with propellant bonded to the aluminum casing with silicone, shown as factor of safety in the parts. The first plot is a section through the middle of the grain, the second showing an end of the grain.

Compare to a grain cast directly into the casing.

Fully bonded segmented grain stresses

Stresses in a segmented KNSB rocket motor, with propellant strips fully bonded to the aluminum casing using silicone, shown as factor of safety in the parts. The first plot is a section through the middle of the grain, the second showing an end of the grain.

Web bonded segmented grain stresses

Stresses in a segmented KNSB rocket motor, with propellant strips bonded to the aluminum casing by 1″ wide webs on the back, shown as factor of safety in the parts. The first plot is a section through the middle of the grain, the second showing an end of the grain.

Casebonded grain stresses

Stresses in a casebonded KNSB rocket motor, with propellant cast directly into an aluminum casing, shown as factor of safety in the parts. The first plot is a section through the middle of the grain, the second showing an end of the grain.
Image

Image